Sustainability Monitoring Russia
Sustainability Monitoring Russia
Sustainability Monitoring Russia
Sustainability Monitoring Russia Sustainability Monitoring Russia
The energy transition

Russia’s position in green energy underscores the country’s rich potential, although the scale of actual projects under way is still rather modest. The share of wind and solar power of Russia’s energy mix does not exceed 1%. At the same time, according to Deputy Prime Minister Alexander Novak at the International Financial Congress, Russia plans to increase the share of renewables in the energy balance by 10 times by 2040. Although calculations show that if the most ambitious plans are implemented, the share of renewables, without large hydro power plants, in Russia will reach only 2-2.5% by 2035. With the risk of foreign investors leaving the Russian energy sector (Enel Russia, Fortum, Unipro), the growth of renewables in the energy mix will slow down even more.

According to Rosstat, electricity generation reached 1,157 billion kWh in 2021. Thermal power plants were and still are the main supplier of electricity to the unified energy system of the country. Last year, the share of TPP generation was 62%. In 2016 it was 65%, and in 2011 it was 68%. HPPs produced 216 billion kWh of electricity in 2021. This is 19% of the country’s total electricity production. In 2016, the share of HPPs was 17%, and in 2011 it was 16%. The share of nuclear power generation increased from 16% in 2011 and 18% in 2016 to 19% in 2021. At the same time, in 2020, NPPs and HPPs – low-carbon energy sources – will each generate 20% of electricity. The Ministry of Energy noted during Russian Energy Week in 2021 that the share of nuclear power stations should increase to 24-25% by 2050, while the share of gas generation will remain at about the current level of just over 40%. At the same time, the share of coal-fired generation will gradually decline, reaching 4.5% of generation by 2050, with 22.2 GW of coal-fired TPP equipment to be decommissioned. Solar and wind power generation will increase from around 4.5% by 2035 and further to 12-12.5% by 2050-2060. As a result, the share of carbon-free and low-carbon generation, which is 41% today, will be around 47% by 2035 and 56.5% by 2050. Of this, 19% will come from hydroelectricity, 25% from nuclear power and 12.5% from renewables. Evgeny Gasho, expert consultant at the Analytical Centre under the Government of the Russian Federation, said the following: “Few countries can boast the energy mix that Russia has now. The share of low-carbon hydro and nuclear power in total electricity generation is over 40 per cent and a further 20 per cent in combined cycle power generation in thermal power plants. Russia’s specific carbon intensity is the lowest in the world, Denmark is slightly behind us, but the carbon intensity of other developed countries and global averages are not even comparable to ours.”

Energy sector readiness for the energy transition is determined not only by green or low-carbon kilowatts and the level of localisation of green technologies, but also by the level of energy efficiency of traditional energy subsectors, their technological sophistication and adaptability. Most enterprises in the sector have a technologically low share of electricity and heat consumption from external sources, as well as a low share of motor fuel consumption. This is a sector specific feature of energy utilities in the energy transition readiness ranking. On the other hand, in terms of energy efficiency dynamics, automation and adaptability, the enterprises are well placed in the ranking. Recall that these include holdings from outside the main ranking (hyperlink), subholdings and enterprises, which can be categorised in the table using a filter.

The energy transition

TPP
CHPP
HPP
NPP
Power Grids
Heating networks
Teploenergoservis
.

Position

Position

.

Name

1

Efficiency over 15 years

2

Importance of external infrastructure

3

Share of motor fuel

4

Energy revenue

5

Automation (benchmark)

6

Dynamics of Automation

7

Adaptability

Saratovskaia TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Novomoskovskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Shaturskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Samara TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Neryungri TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Sredneuralskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
High

Berezovskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Gusinoozerskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Cherepetskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
High

Yakutsk State District Power Plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
High

South Kuzbass TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Zainsk State District Power Plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Nevinnomysskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Konakovskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Urengoy TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Pskovskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Sakhalin TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

TPP-3 by Klasson

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Yakutia TPP-2

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Serovskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Smolensk TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Nizhnevartovsk TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Yaivinskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Kashirskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Troitskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Kharanorskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Surgutskaya TPP-1

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Kirishskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Belovskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Yuzhnouralskaya TPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Yoshkar-Ola thermal power plant No. 1

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

CHPP-3 Ivanovo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Magadan CHPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Penza CHPP-1

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

CHPP-2 Ivanovo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Bereznikovskaya CHPP-2

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Sormovskaya CHPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Ulyanovsk CHPP – 2

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Marikommunenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Chukotenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Vladimirsky

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Kirovskaya CHPP-5

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Syzran CHPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Yakutsk combined heat and power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Mordovian

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Norilskenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Boiler Arbekovo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
High

Ivanovsky

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

CHPP Volga Automobile Plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Novokuibyshevskaya CHPP-1

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Perm CHPP-6

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Balakovskaya CHPP-4

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Saratov CHPP-5

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Orenburg

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Izhevsk CHPP-1

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Mordovian

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Murmansk CHPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Generation of Buryatia

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Ulyanovsk CHPP-1

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Efremovskaya CHPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Zagorskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Votkinskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Svetlinskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Sayano-Shushenskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Kamskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Zeyskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Volzhskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Nizhny Novgorod HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Vilyuisky Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Cascade of the Kuban HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Cheboksary HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Sunsky Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
High

Kolyma HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Nizhnekamsk HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Narva HPP (HPP-13)

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Ladoga Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Volkhovskaya HPP №6 (HPP-6)

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Ust-Srednekanskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Dagestan

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Vuoksa HPP Cascade (Cascade-1)

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Saratov HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Kemsky Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Volga Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Tuloma Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Bureyskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Vygsky Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Nivsky Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
High

Zhigulevskaya HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Paz Cascade HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Novosibirsk HPP

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Bilibino Nuclear Power Plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Balakovo nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Beloyarsk nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
High

Kursk nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Leningrad nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Kalinin nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Smolensk nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Rostov nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Novovoronezh nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Kola nuclear power plant

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Gorelektroset

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
High

Municipal unitary enterprise of the city of Cherepovets “Electroset”

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Pyatigorsk electrical networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
High

Tyvaenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

SUE Stavropolkommunelectro

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

South Yakutsk Electric Networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Karelenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Electrical networks of the Jewish Autonomous Region

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Novgorodobleelectro

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Rosseti North Caucasus

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Oblkommunenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Tomsk Distribution Company

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Orenburgkommunelektroset

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Khabarovsk electrical networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Bashkir network company

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Buryatenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Amur Electric Networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Altaienergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Tula City Electric Networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Primorsky electric networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Khabarovsk city power grid

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Novgorod

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Smolenskenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Bryanskenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Bashkir distribution electrical networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Krymenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Circassian city electrical networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely high
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
High

Energy Technology

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Ivenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
High

State Unitary Enterprise of the Moscow Region Power Grid

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Extremely high

Municipal Unitary Enterprise of the City of Khabarovsk Heating networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Petrozavodsk utility systems

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Vilyui branch Teploenergoservis

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

TomskRTS

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Extremely low

Housing and communal services of the Chekhov region

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely high
Adaptability
Value
Low

Aldan branch Teploenergoservis

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Teploenergoservis

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Heating network

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

MUP of the Moscow Region Energetik

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Ural Heat Network Company

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Extremely high
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Usinsk thermal company

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Municipal unitary enterprise of Domodedovo city district Teploset

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Ulyanovsk Municipal Unitary Enterprise City Heating Network

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Bashkir distribution heating networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Yugansktransteploservis

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
Moderate
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Pskov heating networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Krasnoyarsk Heat and Power Company

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Regiongaz-invest

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Sevteploenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Moderate
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Low
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Moderate
Adaptability
Value
Low

Almetyevsk heating networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Extremely low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Orenburg heating networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely low
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

MUMP public utilities

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Energoneft Tomsk

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Low
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Ivgorteploenergo

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Moderate
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Moderate
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Moderate
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Chita Energy Complex

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Low
Adaptability
Value
Moderate

Smolenskteploset

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
High
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
Extremely high
Share of motor fuel
Value
High
Energy revenue
Value
Extremely high
Automation (benchmark)
Value
Low
Dynamics of Automation
Value
Extremely low
Adaptability
Value
Low

Astrakhan heating networks

Efficiency over 15 years
Value
Extremely high
Importance of external infrastructure
Value
High
Share of motor fuel
Value
Low
Energy revenue
Value
High
Automation (benchmark)
Value
High
Dynamics of Automation
Value
High
Adaptability
Value
Low

Engineering networks of the city of Dolgoprudny